Thursday, June 13, 2013

My current favorite poem by Marie Howe

MAGDALENE–THE SEVEN DEVILS
by Marie Howe
“Mary, called Magdalene, from whom seven devils had been cast out” —Luke 8:2.
The first was that I was very busy.
The second — I was different from you: whatever happened to you could not happen to me, not like that.
The third — I worried.
The fourth – envy, disguised as compassion.
The fifth was that I refused to consider the quality of life of the aphid,
The aphid disgusted me. But I couldn’t stop thinking about it.
The mosquito too – its face. And the ant – its bifurcated body.
Ok the first was that I was so busy.
The second that I might make the wrong choice,
because I had decided to take that plane that day,
that flight, before noon, so as to arrive early
and, I shouldn’t have wanted that.
The third was that if I walked past the certain place on the street
the house would blow up.
The fourth was that I was made of guts and blood with a thin layer of skin
lightly thrown over the whole thing.
The fifth was that the dead seemed more alive to me than the living
The sixth — if I touched my right arm I had to touch my left arm, and if I touched the left arm a little harder than I’d first touched the right then I had to retouch the left and then touch the right again so it would be even.
The seventh — I knew I was breathing the expelled breath of everything that was alive and I couldn’t stand it,
I wanted a sieve, a mask, a, I hate this word – cheesecloth –
to breath through that would trap it — whatever was inside everyone else that
entered me when I breathed in
No. That was the first one.
The second was that I was so busy. I had no time. How had this happened? How had our lives gotten like this?
The third was that I couldn’t eat food if I really saw it – distinct, separate from me in a bowl or on a plate.
Ok. The first was that I could never get to the end of the list.
The second was that the laundry was never finally done.
The third was that no one knew me, although they thought they did.
And that if people thought of me as little as I thought of them then what was
love?
Someone using you as a co-ordinate to situate himself on earth.
The fourth was I didn’t belong to anyone. I wouldn’t allow myself to belong
to anyone.
Historians would assume my sin was sexual.
The fifth was that I knew none of us could ever know what we didn’t know.
The sixth was that I projected onto others what I myself was feeling.
The seventh was the way my mother looked when she was dying.
The sound she made — the gurgling sound — so loud we had to speak louder to hear each other over it.
And that I couldn’t stop hearing it–years later –
grocery shopping, crossing the street –
No, not the sound – it was her body’s hunger
finally evident.–what our mother had hidden all her life.
For months I dreamt of knucklebones and roots,
the slabs of sidewalk pushed up like crooked teeth by what grew underneath.
The underneath —that was the first devil. It was always with me.
And that I didn’t think you— if I told you – would understand any of this -

My Favorite Teaching

Nagarjuna's String of Precious Jewels

I’ll tell you briefly the fine qualities of those
on the path of compassion:
giving and ethics, patience and effort,
concentration, wisdom, compassion and such.

Giving is giving away what you have,
and ethics is doing good to others.
Patience is giving up feelings of anger,
and effort is joy that increases all good.

Concentration’s one-pointed, free of bad thoughts,
and wisdom decides what truth really is.
Compassion’s a kind of high intelligence,
mixed deep with a love for all living kind.

Giving brings wealth, a good world comes from ethics,
patience brings beauty, eminence comes from effort.
Concentration brings peace, and from wisdom comes freedom,
compassion achieves everything we all wish for.

A person who takes all seven of these and
perfects them together will reach that place
of inconceivable knowledge, no less than
the world’s protector.

The Whistleblower's Moral Span

I have heard pundits bemoan that in this Snowden Prism case, he, rather than the material he released becomes too much of the story. For me, though, the interesting question is not about what he made public, but WHY? I think some understanding of who he is and why he did it helps us to evaluate how to think about this act.

To most, it would seem obvious that his morality is non- conventional. Conventional  morality would say that this act is against the law, so it is immoral to do it. Conventional morality is focused on the individual's place in societal norms. Those who describe him as a High School dropout, an ignoramus, (how could Booz have hired this guy?) seem pretty clearly to view him as backward, perhaps unable to evaluate the consequences of his actions, motivated by some need for individual glory. 

There is another option, however. His may be a Post-Conventional morality, which is driven by a higher and deeper sense of morality which differentiates from the societal, and reintegrates into a larger system of meaning.  Reports from those who actually spoke with him about the leak suggest a very thoughtful deliberative man who was very careful about what he chose to release an what he didn't. 

Hard to know, though, from limited information.... What is fascinating, and what is important to know, I think, is how this man thought about what he was doing. What is clear, though, is that a post-conventional morality runs ahead of the societal morality under which this man and other Whistleblowers will be tried. How do we evaluate one's motives, and how are these motives able to affect the meting out of justice?

Wednesday, July 21, 2010

#SARAHPALIN: #Refudiate the Shallow!

Twitter is the prefect medium for Sarah Palin. A 140 character limit suits someone who would rather post a semi-random thought that has just occurred to her than something that has actually been thought deeply about.

"Oh!" She thinks. "Mosque.... #Muslim...#WorldTradeCenterSite....#9/11...#(insert random vague weapon reference, such as reload or stab)..." This requires, no effort to evaluate what we see relative to our beliefs or biases, or to imagine what other possible stories or values underlie the thing. What it does is resonate with others who agree and anger those who don't and perplex those who care for the deep over the superficial.

Alas, this shallowness is everywhere. Where a #blackwoman is fired for #Racism against a #whitefarmer without carefully considering the facts.....erupting furor right and left... doesn't it just get the juices flowing?!

Considering Depth requires some effort, some facing of ourselves, soul searching, taking the perspective of another. I don't think Sarah Palin is cognitively incapable of doing these things, just that it requires too much effort or doesn't pay off in the stirring up of her supporters (or detractors... after all.... all publicity is good publicity).

We have seen depth. What comes to mind is Barack Obama's speech about his then Pastor and the subject of racism. No big sound bites, but satisfying thoughts to consider. Maybe also his speech to the Arab World early in his presidency... not simple, not showy, not likely to generate exciting sound bites, but, as Jon Stewart said, "Wow! He's treating us like adults!!!"

I exhort you, #SarahPalin (look it up..) Repudiate the shallow. Go a little deeper. Please.

Friday, April 16, 2010

Eleven dimensions in M-theory and Poop Bags

I think I understand about the extra dimensions necessary to make m-theory (look it up) work. Not that I know what they were created for. Just assuming they ARE, I think I figured out what their effect is.

I was walking with Wally, my black and white terrier mix, as I do every morning, around the school up the street. I always carry poop bags (we wouldn't want to be responsible for some 3rd to fifth grader coming in with that on his or her shoes..) in my coat pocket. When I subscribed to the Globe, I had a ready supply of freebies. Since I gave it up (after they doubled the price!!), I must rely on the odd produce bag or buy garishly colored biodegradable ones at Petco. Anyway... if I can, I use the bag as a glove (mitten really) and pick up the turd and heave it into the woods beyond. Then I can dispose of the empty (more or less) bag in either the school dumpster or one of many large barrels on the athletic field. OK... I found from experience that on a windy day, such a bag is likely to take flight out of the barrel or dumpster, so, not wanting to see it out there another morning, I have learned to knot the bag as many times as possible to anchor it better.

So one morning, don't ask me why...Eureka! It came to me that the extra dimensions, which are believed to be tiny knotted up things, serve as extra mass to keep this universe tied down so it won't blow away out of existence. Maybe it is also what accounts for dark matter (look that up too). I thought further that these dimensions are probably knotted up and we are limited (?!) to 3 spacial and one time dimension, because when the universe blew into being from the singularity, it didn't fully blow out as much as it could have. I am guessing that this is a good thing, a lucky turn of events because if we did exist in seven or nine or eleven dimensions, things would be pretty wierd.


Not that I am comparing the universe to a dog shit bag....

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Skill In Means

So what is Skill in Means? From the Buddhist concept, Upaya Kausalya... the story goes, a man's house was burning and he was not having success getting his family out. He went to the first, who loved horses, and told her there was a pony outside for her. To the next, who loved money, he said there was a pile of gold outside, and so on with whatever the family members most desired. Though it was all a lie, it was enough to get them out of the house.

The point is not so much that it is OK to lie for a good reason, but that one has to use the method which will work best given the person one is working with. It is seen as a melding of Wisdom and Compassion, the ascent of the many to the one and the descent of the one to the many...

So for me skill in means involves using the proper language out of the particular world-view out of which a given person is operating. THis involves assessing what that world view is and speaking its language. And to paraphrase Bob Kegan, it involves welcoming a person at the level they're AT and simultaneously sewing the seeds for that level's breakdown (toward upward movement to the next higher and more encompassing level of being).

Use Wilber's Integral Operating System, Beck's Spiral Dynamics Integral, Armour/Browning's Systems Sensitive LEadership, whatever works as a VERTICAL TECHNOLOGY.

Vertical- transformative
Horizontal - translative (maintain and enhance the status quo

Wednesday, June 10, 2009